Al Pacino: Oscars producers told me not to read out best picture nominees

Pacino's abrupt presentation - saying ‘And the Oscar goes to ... ‘ before eventually announcing ‘my eyes see Oppenheimer’ - left many viewers confused
Michael Howie12 March 2024
The Weekender

Sign up to our free weekly newsletter for exclusive competitions, offers and theatre ticket deals

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Al Pacino says he was following the instructions of the Academy Award show producers when he omitted the names of the best picture nominees while announcing the winner.

In a statement issued on Monday, Pacino said: "I just want to be clear it was not my intention to omit them, rather a choice by the producers not to have them said again since they were highlighted individually throughout the ceremony.

"I was honoured to be a part of the evening and chose to follow the way they wished for this award to be presented."

He continued: "I realise being nominated is a huge milestone in one's life and to not be fully recognised is offensive and hurtful.

"I say this as someone who profoundly relates with filmmakers, actors and producers so I deeply empathise with those who have been slighted by this oversight and it's why I felt it necessary to make this statement."

Pacino, 83, has been nominated nine times and won best actor for 1992's Scent of a Woman.

The Oscars started late and ended in a respectable time - under last year's runtime - in part because Pacino skipped reading all the nominees which were featured with montages during the show.

Pacino's abrupt presentation - saying "And the Oscar goes to ... " before eventually announcing "my eyes see Oppenheimer" - left many viewers confused.

It was not the only category to omit a reading of the nominees. The nominated original songs were all performed on the show and the announcement that What Was I Made For? from Barbie had won was made without listing them again.

Oscars producer Molly McNearney told the trade outlet Variety that skipping the reading of the nominees was intentional.

"It was a creative decision we made because we were very worried that the show was going to be long," she said.

"By the time you get to the end of the show, you've seen all 10 best picture clip packages. People just want to hear who wins and they're pretty ready for the show to be over. At least that's what we anticipated."

She added: "I apologise if our decision to not have to read through all those nominations put him in a tough spot."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in